From lojbab@lojban.org Sun Jun 18 04:28:13 2000
Return-Path: <lojbab@lojban.org>
Received: (qmail 8714 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2000 11:28:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 18 Jun 2000 11:28:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-3.cais.net) (205.252.14.73) by mta1 with SMTP; 18 Jun 2000 11:28:11 -0000
Received: from bob (82.dynamic.cais.com [207.226.56.82]) by stmpy-3.cais.net (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e5IBSAJ47090 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 07:28:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lojbab@lojban.org)
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000618072533.00ba0a50@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 07:28:55 -0400
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] A defense of dead horse beating
In-Reply-To: <20000617232956.20554.qmail@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>

At 04:29 PM 06/17/2000 -0700, Jorge Llambias wrote:
>I think it is a mistake to assume that since the language
>is baselined then everything has already been settled.
>On the contrary, most things haven't. As an example, I
>still haven't been able to figure out a comfortable way
>of saying "even", as in "even the cat wants to go".
>I usually use {ji'a} for that, but I know it doesn't
>really capture the whole meaning.

Which is....?

If you can define the problem, the solution may come to mind - probably as 
ji'a *plus* another UI, IMHO.

lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org


