From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sun Jun 25 18:30:29 2000
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
Received: (qmail 5585 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2000 01:30:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 26 Jun 2000 01:30:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.119) by mta3 with SMTP; 26 Jun 2000 01:30:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 44056 invoked by uid 0); 26 Jun 2000 01:30:26 -0000
Message-ID: <20000626013026.44055.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 200.41.247.49 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 18:30:26 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.49]
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] RECORD: containers
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 18:30:26 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>


la rafael cusku di'e

>kunti botpi ? (yuk!)

In a tanru, botpi keeps all of its arguments, so the
relationship {kunti botpi} still has to hold between
a container object and a content object.

On the other hand {botpi kunti} does work, because in
this case the places are those of {kunti}.

Or, we can make a lujvo: {kuntybopti} which has its
own place structure.

>botpi be zi'o ? (better...)

Yes, this one works, if you don't have a prejudice against
{zi'o} as I do... :)
This one works for all bottles, independent of whether they
have contents or not, which becomes irrelevant.

co'o mi'e xorxes


________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


