From pycyn@aol.com Wed Jun 28 08:31:25 2000
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
Received: (qmail 7559 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2000 15:31:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 28 Jun 2000 15:31:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r12.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.66) by mta1 with SMTP; 28 Jun 2000 15:31:22 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r12.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.10.) id a.42.774362e (4409) for <lojban@egroups.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:31:05 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <42.774362e.268b7439@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:31:05 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Computing in lojbanistan
To: lojban@egroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41
From: pycyn@aol.com

Sometime within the last year (since I started keeping records) someone 
assured us that 'lb' stood for Lojban in some ISO-long-string-of-numbers. Do 
these pronouncements change so rapidly? And, if so, ought we pay them any 
attention at all?