From rob@twcny.rr.com Wed Jun 28 21:40:18 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32267 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2000 04:40:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 29 Jun 2000 04:40:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout1-1.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.81) by mta1 with SMTP; 29 Jun 2000 04:40:17 -0000 Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-1 [24.92.226.139]) by mailout1-1.nyroc.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03613 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:38:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from aylee.twcny.rr.com ([24.92.245.52]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-53939U80000L80000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:38:44 -0400 Received: from rob by aylee.twcny.rr.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 137W3j-0001he-00; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:36:15 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:36:15 -0400 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: More about bottles Message-ID: <20000629003615.A6492@twcny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com From: rob@twcny.rr.com I can get how something can be a 'botpi' as long as it is potentially going to bottle something. But that's only the x2 place. Consider the place 'with lid x4'. If a bottle is designed in such a way that it does not have a lid, and it's a pretty slim chance that it'll even potentially have a lid, is it a botpi? -- Rob Speer