Subject: Re: [lojban] Opposite of za'o

From: "Jorge Llambias" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 16:54:08 PDT

la pycyn cusku di'e

>But isn't {na za'o} either ungrammatical or exactly equivalent to {zo'o 
>na},
>{na} having to occur immediately before the predicate and yet govering the
>whole bridi?

It is both grammatical and (I think) not equivalent.

{na} can alternate with as many tenses as it pleases, and
the whole thing occurs immediately before the predicate and
governs the whole bridi. {na roroi} should be equipollent
to {su'oroi na}.

co'o mi'e xorxes

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com