From xod@sixgirls.org Sat Jul 01 22:26:39 2000
Return-Path: <xod@sixgirls.org>
Received: (qmail 31529 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2000 05:26:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Jul 2000 05:26:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (207.252.3.72) by mta1 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2000 05:26:38 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.9.3+3.2W/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA27305 for <lojban@onelist.com>; Sun, 2 Jul 2000 01:26:38 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 01:26:37 -0400 (EDT)
To: Lojban Listserver <lojban@egroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] RE: opposite of za'o
In-Reply-To: <00070200261107.00989@neofelis>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0007020124530.27221-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Pierre Abbat wrote:


> Well, according to jbofi'e, "fe'e nanca" isn't grammatical either.
> 
> As to "fe'efe'e", I figured that time is real, the space dimensions are the
> three imaginaries, i, j, and k, and i^2=-1, so "fe'efe'e" turns positive time
> into negative time.


Yes. What a beautiful, elegant idea! If "fe'efe'e" isn't grammatical, we
should find a different way to express this.



-----
Wait! RSA Algorithm is coplicated, so many mathematical calculation.
Please, wait for a little while or more during Decryption as your
computer system.


