From phma@oltronics.net Tue Jul 04 14:29:33 2000
Return-Path: <phma@oltronics.net>
Received: (qmail 27962 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2000 21:29:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 4 Jul 2000 21:29:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.oltronics.net) (204.213.85.8) by mta1 with SMTP; 4 Jul 2000 21:29:33 -0000
Received: from neofelis (root@localhost) by mail.oltronics.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA03556 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2000 17:29:30 -0400
X-BlackMail: 207.15.133.38, neofelis, <phma@oltronics.net>, 207.15.133.38
X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 17:29:30(EDT) on July 04, 2000
To: <lojban@egroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Now I herd everything!
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 17:26:43 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28]
Content-Type: text/plain
References: <NDBBIPNCMMCHDALLBJFEAECDCCAA.colin@kindness.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <NDBBIPNCMMCHDALLBJFEAECDCCAA.colin@kindness.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <00070417292904.05126@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

>I don't think it is congruous in its precision. By which I mean that you are
>using a prenex, but then leaving the relationship between the se danlu and
>the da unspecified. .iseni'ibo su'ore da se bevri

Is this any better?:

ro se danlu be re da zo'u la noax. bevri da le taxlo'i

co'omi'e pier.