From jjllambias@hotmail.com Tue Jul 04 17:00:40 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2137 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2000 00:00:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 5 Jul 2000 00:00:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.62) by mta1 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2000 00:00:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 62884 invoked by uid 0); 5 Jul 2000 00:00:40 -0000 Message-ID: <20000705000040.62883.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 200.42.154.144 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Tue, 04 Jul 2000 17:00:40 PDT X-Originating-IP: [200.42.154.144] To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: RE: [lojban] Complements and adjuncts Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2000 17:00:40 PDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed From: "Jorge Llambias" la adam cusku di'e >bloti teka'a la nu,IORK > >meaning that the boat (the x1) is coming from New York >and not the event or property of being a boat. Well, presumably the cargo and the propellent(?) are coming from New York too, so it could be justifiable to say that the bloti relationship itself comes from there. >Maybe >the x1 is special and a BAI not attached to a sumti could >be understood as attached to the x1. I think it goes too much against the arguments/predicate idea, but indeed it is a "mistake" that occurs very often, so it may end up as that. In many cases the BAI is meant for some other argument than the x1 though. co'o mi'e xorxes ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com