From jjllambias@hotmail.com Wed Jul 05 19:08:22 2000
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
Received: (qmail 19373 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2000 02:08:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 6 Jul 2000 02:08:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.194) by mta1 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2000 02:08:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 603 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jul 2000 02:08:21 -0000
Message-ID: <20000706020821.602.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 200.32.23.94 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Wed, 05 Jul 2000 19:08:21 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [200.32.23.94]
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Englishistic
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 19:08:21 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>


la ivAn cusku di'e

>And as van der Auwera points out (in the article I cited),
>this is the usual way: very many languages have expressions for
>`still', `not yet' and `no longer', but not for `already' --
>so the apparent symmetry of the quadrangle is deceptive.

I imagine not many languages have a word for "not all"
in the "all", "some", "none", "not all" quadrangle (for
example our logical Lojban doesn't) but that doesn't mean
that the quadrangle's symmetry is deceptive, only maybe that
some situations may not be as striking as others.

co'o mi'e xorxes

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


