From jjllambias@hotmail.com Wed Jul 05 19:22:30 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27253 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2000 02:22:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 6 Jul 2000 02:22:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.241) by mta1 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2000 02:22:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 32730 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jul 2000 02:22:29 -0000 Message-ID: <20000706022229.32729.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 200.32.23.94 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Wed, 05 Jul 2000 19:22:29 PDT X-Originating-IP: [200.32.23.94] To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: li [date] (was: RE: [lojban] Lojban / Most translated Web Page Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 19:22:29 PDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed From: "Jorge Llambias" coi ui doi and > > {li 2000;05;07} can be nothing but May 7th of this year, > >In any context, or as a date sumti of certain predicates? I think I meant it as a date. Given the two choices YYYYMMDD and DDMMYYYY it could not be doubted which convention was being used. >Presumably the latter. I presume "ca li 2000;05;07" is >nonsense? If so, what is the concisest way to rephrase it >sensically? {de'i li 2000;05;07} in this case. However, {co'a de'i li 2000;05;07} doesn't work, it breaks as {co'a ku de'i li 2000;05;07}. Maybe {co'a ko'a goi de'i li 2000;05;07}. But I won't complain at {co'a li 2000;05;07}. What else could it mean? co'o mi'e xorxes co'o mi'e xorxes ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com