From lojbab@lojban.org Fri Jul 07 03:56:01 2000
Return-Path: <lojbab@lojban.org>
Received: (qmail 1439 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2000 10:56:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 7 Jul 2000 10:56:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-5.cais.net) (205.252.14.75) by mta1 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2000 10:56:00 -0000
Received: from bob (ppp46.net-A.cais.net [205.252.61.46]) by stmpy-5.cais.net (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e67AtwV39107; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 06:55:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lojbab@lojban.org)
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000707064942.00b0b430@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 06:55:55 -0400
To: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>, lojban@egroups.com
Subject: RE: [lojban] Bringing it about that 
In-Reply-To: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMCEIPCLAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
References: <d9.2ca6b75.2626e6f3@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>

And Rosta wrote:
> > From: pycyn@aol.com
> > Sent: 13 April 2000 10:02
> >
> > The start is to Lojban "John made me hit him," ...
>
>I read this as a correct argument against (overzealous, overfastidious)
>sumti-raising, and the followup messages from Jorge &, eventually, Lojbab
>appear to concur. Was that the final consensus? I ask because Lojban
>Central & associated pedagogues have traditionally made a big fuss about
>so-called sumti-raising, which struck me as bogus. I therefore wonder
>whether what John wd call its bogosity has now been recognized by the
>politburo.

I dunno, since I don't remember reading this post by pc (not to say that I 
didn't - I just don't remember it). If I responded to something later, I 
responded to that later post alone. As for recognizing bogosity, it isn't 
entirely clear what position you find bogus, so I cannot say, but I don't 
recall changing my position on anything pertaining to sumti-raising in 
recent months. I make a big fuss about sumti-raising because it is a good 
pedagogical tool for getting people to think about what they are trying to 
say and getting out of malglico habits.

lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org


