From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri Jul 07 17:10:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8325 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2000 00:10:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 8 Jul 2000 00:10:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.131) by mta1 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2000 00:10:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 21657 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jul 2000 00:10:45 -0000 Message-ID: <20000708001045.21656.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 200.42.154.168 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Fri, 07 Jul 2000 17:10:44 PDT X-Originating-IP: [200.42.154.168] To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: RE: li [date] (was: RE: [lojban] Lojban / Most translated Web Page Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 17:10:44 PDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed From: "Jorge Llambias" la and cusku di'e >Would you complain at {co'a li 2000}? I presume the reason >for you not complaining is that it is unlikely to be >misunderstood, rather than that it makes literal sense. It would make literal sense if li-numbers could be used as labels. I'm not sure that they can't, probably not. Another convention that has been used is {co'a la 2000n} = {co'a la reki'on}. (Adding -nan instead of -n is not so good because nan is the rafsi for {snanu}, which could have another meaning with numbers.) co'o mi'e xorxes ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com