From grey.havens@earthling.net Mon Jul 10 11:23:06 2000
Return-Path: <grey.havens@earthling.net>
Received: (qmail 22736 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2000 18:19:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 10 Jul 2000 18:19:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO postfix1.free.fr) (212.27.32.21) by mta1 with SMTP; 10 Jul 2000 18:19:42 -0000
Received: from tam.n (marseille2-1-60-180.dial.proxad.net [212.27.60.180]) by postfix1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD22F280C1 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:19:40 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:19:17 +0200 (CEST)
X-Sender: elrond@tam.n
To: Lojban List <lojban@egroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Vocabulary (more to come)
In-Reply-To: <39682911.6F58@math.bas.bg>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007102018160.1133-100000@tam.n>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Elrond <grey.havens@earthling.net>


li'o
> My idea of a logical way of ending them would be a consonant
> that can't occur finally in Quenya, so that it would be
> immediately obvious that, say, the final consonant in _formen_'s
> name is original and the one in _parma_'s is an addition
> prompted by Lojban's conventions.
Bright idea. Thank you.

> I hereby nominate {m} for the position of stopper in lojbanised
> Quenya words.
It seems all right for most names, also a final "om" doesn't sound very
nice... However let's stick with it, unless someone, someday, comes up
with something better.


Regards
raph