From pycyn@aol.com Mon Jul 10 13:19:51 2000
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
Received: (qmail 12860 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2000 20:19:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 10 Jul 2000 20:19:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r10.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.10) by mta1 with SMTP; 10 Jul 2000 20:19:50 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.12.) id a.a8.79171bc (3959) for <lojban@egroups.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 16:19:34 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <a8.79171bc.269b89d5@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 16:19:33 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] aymara once mora
To: lojban@egroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41
From: pycyn@aol.com

In a message dated 00-07-10 12:54:40 EDT, you write:

<<I n other words: not at all? (Basque is not related to any other known
language.) >>

Exactly.

I'm not sure whether Basque is still a totally isolated langauge (I seem to 
remember some deep stuff on the edges of the Nostratic people making a 
connection with Caucasian) but most people seem to hold that Aymara and 
Quechua are as unrelated as two American langauges can be.

In passing: a groan for the limit story and a note that the identity of 
indiscernibles is Leibnitz, not Locke.