From pycyn@aol.com Tue Jul 11 02:10:12 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7402 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2000 09:10:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 11 Jul 2000 09:10:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d04.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 11 Jul 2000 09:10:11 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.10.) id a.57.83812f0 (3929) for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 05:10:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <57.83812f0.269c3e6e@aol.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 05:10:06 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban and English To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com In a message dated 00-07-10 18:21:40 EDT, & writes: << pc: > For the moment, it looks like a bunch of Platonists are carving > a niche in an Aristotelian language. Neat-o. Why does it look thus? >> I take talking about (insisting that there are) breeds of dogs to which no dog ever belongs anyworld is Platonism in a form even Plato would recognize.