From pycyn@aol.com Tue Jul 11 09:41:07 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20987 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2000 16:24:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 11 Jul 2000 16:24:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d07.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.39) by mta1 with SMTP; 11 Jul 2000 16:24:03 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.12.) id a.20.87bb743 (4408) for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 12:23:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20.87bb743.269ca41a@aol.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 12:23:54 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] mass properties & Re: Translating names To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com In a message dated 00-07-11 11:01:28 EDT, & writes: << 1. During the Feb/March period when Lojban-list wouldn't send me messages, there was a discussion on properties of masses, which I mostly missed. Did anyone make a summary, or at least archive those messages (from Jorge & pc in particular) that served as a de facto summary? If no summary exists, might I suggest we collaborate on providing one (a kind of massification faq)? >> The discussion was, to put it kindly, indecisive on a number of central points. Ihave been unable to sort it even (note: this is the minimal requirement, the most likely thing) into a reasonable set of positions and their arguments, let alone some agreed upon points. I am no doubt hindered by the fact that I am a partisan, but I must admit that I am even unsure of my own position when I finish reading the pile (all of which I have, by the way).