From robin@BILKENT.EDU.TR Mon Jul 17 10:10:49 2000
Return-Path: <robin@Bilkent.EDU.TR>
Received: (qmail 4191 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2000 17:10:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 17 Jul 2000 17:10:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO firat.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr) (139.179.10.13) by mta1 with SMTP; 17 Jul 2000 17:10:47 -0000
Received: from bilkent.edu.tr (IDENT:robin@fast3.fen.bilkent.edu.tr [139.179.97.28]) by firat.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e6HHDej00406 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 20:13:40 +0300 (EET DST)
Sender: robin@Bilkent.EDU.TR
Message-ID: <39733D14.E4987E90@bilkent.edu.tr>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 20:06:28 +0300
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: "which?" (was: RE: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component
References: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMOEBICMAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robin <robin@BILKENT.EDU.TR>

la .and. cusku di'e

> A: mi na jimpe le nanmu se mamta ku (goi ko'a poi ke'a vi jufra)
> [I don't understand the son, i.e. this here sentence]
> B: le nanmu se mamta be ma
> [son of what?]
> A: lo ninmu zei gerku
> [a bitch]
> 
> ? [I can't remember the words for 'male' and 'female'.]

"lo ninmu zei gerku" would be a female humanoid dog. Female is {fetsi}
(I remember it by thinking of "feisty"), so "bitch" would be {fe'igerku}
or {fetyge'u}, I presume. Of course if you use it in the derogatory
sense, it's terribly malglico ;-)

Speaking of which, in the cyberpunk RPG I'm running (where Lojban is the
language of choice for geeks and academics) a player asked me for a
Lojban way to insult someone, and I replied off the top of my head: "le
do mamta cu gerku". Is this

(a) impermissable culturally specific metaphor (i.e. malglico)?
(b) not really malglico (because in virtually no culture would someone
appreciate being called a dog) but meaningless if talking to a human and
tautological if talking to a dog?
(c) not exactly "high Lojban" but permissable given the communicative
context (i.e. the listener would automatically fill in the missing
{pe'a} or read the sentence as "le do mamta cu simla lo'e gerku")?


co'o mi'e robin.