From broca@fix.no Fri Jul 28 15:43:09 2000
Return-Path: <broca@fix.no>
Received: (qmail 24357 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2000 22:43:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 28 Jul 2000 22:43:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ei.egroups.com) (10.1.2.114) by mta1 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2000 22:43:07 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: broca@fix.no
Received: from [10.1.10.103] by ei.egroups.com with NNFMP; 28 Jul 2000 22:43:08 -0000
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 22:42:57 -0000
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: tertirxu
Message-ID: <8lt29h+m94n@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <F127JSFsxf4yp8ARf3s00000095@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 825
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 193.71.201.59
From: "Arnt Richard Johansen" <broca@fix.no>

> There are only two animals that got weird place structures.
> One is the tiger. Can anyone guess what the other is without
> looking it up?

lanme lan sheep 'lanolin, lamb' x1 is a 
sheep/[lamb/ewe/ram] of species/breed x2 of flock x3 (cf. kanba, 
sunla)

> (Actually, there is a third animal with a different
> place structure, in this case with one place less instead of one
> more, but I think that one is easy to guess.)

remna rem re'a human x1 is a 
human/human being/man (non-specific gender-free sense); (adjective:) 
x1 is human (cf. nanmu, ninmu, prenu)

> Is {ri skari le tertirxu} very different from {ri skari le tirxu}
> or better {ri skari lo'e tirxu}?

go'i .i ro tirxu cu skari gi'e danlu .i ku'i no tirxu cu se skari

co'o mi'e tsali