From lojbab@lojban.org Sat Jul 29 22:11:47 2000
Return-Path: <lojbab@lojban.org>
Received: (qmail 21226 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2000 05:11:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 30 Jul 2000 05:11:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-4.cais.net) (205.252.14.74) by mta1 with SMTP; 30 Jul 2000 05:11:47 -0000
Received: from bob (81.dynamic.cais.com [207.226.56.81]) by stmpy-4.cais.net (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e6U5BjE87178 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 01:11:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lojbab@lojban.org)
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000730010430.00b51100@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 01:10:28 -0400
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] tertirxu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007291018210.323-100000@xena.cft.ca.us>
References: <F127JSFsxf4yp8ARf3s00000095@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>

At 10:32 AM 07/29/2000 -0700, Jim Carter wrote:
> > What I am finding difficult about Lojban is learning the right
> > place structures. Any patterns that can be discovered are always
> > full of exceptions, and the result is that I am usually not sure
> > whether or not a given gismu has some mysterious trailing places
> > that I am forgetting...
>
>Hear, hear! There's a lot of value to having regular place structures. I
>put a fair amount of work into regularizing the place structures in Old
>Loglan (an effort that didn't fly), and a lot of semantic categories are
>very amenable to a "bed of Procrustes" approach. I was disappointed when
>Lojban drifted off in the direction of custom-crafting each predicate's
>definition according to which arguments are most important to it.

You are mistaken to presume that we threw out your efforts, Jim. In 
general, words in a common semantic category have the same "arguments most 
important to it", but of course it is the grouping of words by common 
semantic categories that is the tough nut to crack, especially since Lojban 
tries to eschew such categorization as may be culturally biased. I though 
the place structures were fairly systematic based on my mind-set the last 
time I went through them before baselining, but I'm only human. People 
have found places where I was inconsistent, and probably they simply 
haven't discovered all the categorizations I used in deciding what to make 
similar to what else.

lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org


