From pycyn@aol.com Tue Aug 01 08:38:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12209 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2000 15:38:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 1 Aug 2000 15:38:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d08.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.40) by mta1 with SMTP; 1 Aug 2000 15:38:44 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.12.) id a.f3.1627857 (3926) for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 11:38:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 11:38:31 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] slinku'i test To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com In a message dated 00-08-01 06:55:08 EDT, pier writes: << So what might a robe-chain-caretaker be? >> The sacristan who takes care of metal cinctures. But the point is not whether the word makes sense (is a REAL word), it is aboput its structure -- that the fu'ivla inside would not be uniquely decomposible in a string, since paslinku'i would have two legitimate formal readings.