From pycyn@aol.com Wed Aug 02 06:25:51 2000
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
Received: (qmail 24036 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2000 13:25:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Aug 2000 13:25:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d01.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.33) by mta1 with SMTP; 2 Aug 2000 13:25:47 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.12.) id a.33.846d094 (4585) for <lojban@egroups.com>; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:25:36 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <33.846d094.26b97b50@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:25:36 EDT
Subject: RE: SW again at last
To: lojban@egroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41
From: pycyn@aol.com

A. That the bundles are made by the mind runs into the prolem that
the bundle itself -- me, for example -- feels itswlf to be a unity
outside of the obserrver's mind. Of course, you could argue that
that unity is in the bundle's mind, but that does already admit a unit
to the bundle.

B. I should have thought that the "burn" of which "fire" is the same is an 
activity, not a process.

