From phma@oltronics.net Thu Aug 03 21:54:32 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20919 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2000 04:54:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 4 Aug 2000 04:54:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.oltronics.net) (204.213.85.8) by mta1 with SMTP; 4 Aug 2000 04:54:30 -0000 Received: from neofelis (root@localhost) by mail.oltronics.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA21008 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2000 00:54:28 -0400 X-BlackMail: 207.15.133.16, neofelis, , 207.15.133.16 X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 00:54:28(EDT) on August 04, 2000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] MLONGENA Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 00:32:01 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00080400360508.00884@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Pierre Abbat On Thu, 03 Aug 2000, Jorge Llambias wrote: >la pier cusku di'e > >>Actually I'm not sure the fifth letter can't be r. You can tell a brodrena >>from >>a brodrduxiki by whether the letter after the r is a vowel, can't you? > >{brodrena} is of lujvo form, because dr is a permissible initial, >so it can't be a fu'ivla, it's bro+drena. > >But for example prenrena is ok, it canīt be confused with a >prenrduxiki Sorry, I was using "broda" as a metasyntactic variable and didn't notice that it makes a permissible initial in the word. Doohickey likewise. Is a "prenrduxiki" a personamajig? phma