From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Tue Aug 08 00:39:05 2000
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
Received: (qmail 30005 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2000 07:39:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 8 Aug 2000 07:39:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fg.egroups.com) (10.1.2.134) by mta1 with SMTP; 8 Aug 2000 07:39:05 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
Received: from [10.1.10.95] by fg.egroups.com with NNFMP; 08 Aug 2000 07:39:05 -0000
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 07:38:58 -0000
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: Beyond Whorf: "things," "qualities," and the origin of nouns and adjectives
Message-ID: <8modei+g9ev@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.1000807182525.13900I-100000@locke.ccil.org>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 326
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79
From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Alfred_W._Tueting_(T=FCting)?=" <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>

--- In lojban@egroups.com, John Cowan <cowan@c...> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Ivan A Derzhanski wrote:
> 
> > Not to me. In light of {ninmu} `woman', {ninba} makes me imagine
> > an old woman (a granny) rather than a young one (a girl).
> 
> But plainly a "ninba" is a "ba ninmu", no?

Shouldn't that be "nimba"?

.aulun.



