From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri Aug 11 06:11:56 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29353 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2000 13:11:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 11 Aug 2000 13:11:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.18) by mta1 with SMTP; 11 Aug 2000 13:11:56 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 06:11:56 -0700 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Le sanga po le dirba je slabu ke kalcyrzdani---was Re: Big Bang theory Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:11:56 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Aug 2000 13:11:56.0442 (UTC) FILETIME=[B98D27A0:01C00395] From: "Jorge Llambias" la taral cusku di'e >I'm working on it. Usually when I object to something without providing a >replacement is because I'm not skilled enough to determine the correction >myself. I'm getting to the point where I can make a few corrections, but >it's difficult given how packed the cmavo space is. The actually used cmavo space is rather less packed, so a frequency list might be useful there. In any case, saying that something is ungrammatical instead of addressing the content of the message is classical flame-bait, so I thought you were just participating in that other thread... :) >(That "ce'u" has >around 22 possible corrected forms just allowing for simple typographical >errors -- I don't have the time to search them all nor the skill to >whittle down the list easily.) But "ce'u" is correct as is. It was one of the last cmavo to be added, so the list you're using might be old. co'o mi'e xorxes ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com