From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Thu Aug 17 15:50:56 2000
Return-Path: <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Received: (qmail 11338 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2000 22:50:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 17 Aug 2000 22:50:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta1 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2000 22:50:55 -0000
Received: from calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA28588 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 18:52:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200008172252.SAA28588@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban text editing help 
In-Reply-To: Message from Taral <taral@taral.net> of "Thu, 17 Aug 2000 17:42:45 CDT." <200008172244.SAA28367@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> 
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 18:52:49 -0400
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>


Taral writes:
>On 17 Aug, Cyril Slobin wrote:
>
>> It exist and functional. Unfortunately (by standart: me ;-) most lojban
>> unix users uses emacs, not vim. But it works good for me and Mark 
>> confirms it works (at least started once ;-) for him, so "works only on
>> authors computer" barrier is broken. Any more testers? In fact after
>> some testing by other people (authors are typically blind to most
>> obvious errors in their creations) I am to suggest this mode to Bram for
>> inclusion in main Vim distribution (Bram is usually very open for such
>> contributions), so we'll have first text processing tool with lojban
>> support out of the box! I believe it will be a Good Thing, but I am
>> definitely refuse to submit a raw product now. So, again, any testers?
>> Does anybody among 200+ lojban users use vim here?

[piggy-backing due to indiscriminate delete]

Ummm, can I have the URL again? :)

-Robin

-- 
http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
Despite not getting very emotional about it, the fact that quantum
entanglement doesn't allow transmission of information is probably the
most profound dissapointment I've ever experienced. -- RLPowell

