From slobin@ice.ru Fri Aug 18 09:00:06 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5745 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2000 16:00:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 18 Aug 2000 16:00:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fair.ice.ru) (213.128.193.52) by mta1 with SMTP; 18 Aug 2000 16:00:05 -0000 Received: from localhost (slobin@localhost) by fair.ice.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id TAA18050; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 19:59:46 +0400 Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 19:59:46 +0400 (MSD) To: Taral Cc: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban text editing help In-Reply-To: <200008172243.CAA07065@fair.ice.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Cyril Slobin On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Taral wrote: > Absolutely. And I love that lojban hilighting stuff. Unfortunately the > colors come out a bit odd for me - quite usable, but several groups end > up with the same coloring (especially invalid stuff -- all cyan). My intention was: cmavo in yellow, cmene in magenta, gismu in green, errors that this poor tool can recognize in red. Cyan is left for lujvo, fuhivla and possible invalid words that cannot (yet ;-) be recognized as such. I believe morphology (not syntax!) of lojban is Level 3 grammar and therefore can be in theory recognized by regexps, but there will be very long regexps anyway. Current solution seems to be reasonable angry for errors. I'm thinking how to make this job better. If you send me an example of text where to many invalid stuff is "all cyan" - it will be a good statring point for me. [co'o mi'e kir. noi .y. sa noi] -- Cyril Slobin