From pycyn@aol.com Mon Aug 21 10:05:45 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17004 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2000 17:05:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 21 Aug 2000 17:05:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r04.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.4) by mta1 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2000 17:05:44 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.12.) id a.e6.9e3c78b (4522) for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 13:05:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 13:05:28 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] "philosophy" [was:Expressing in Lojban concepts... To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com In a message dated 00-08-21 11:46:17 EDT, maikl writes: << By the way, does it bother anyone else that we don't have a word for "smart"? >> But we so seldom have a use for it. tolbebna? I was all prepared to object to whatever lujvo or tanru you came up with for "philosopher, " but can only question the use of "wise" or "clever," unless clever means something like "able to make up intricate puzzles that others find hard to unravel"