From phma@oltronics.net Wed Aug 23 03:39:00 2000
Return-Path: <phma@oltronics.net>
Received: (qmail 5623 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2000 10:39:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 23 Aug 2000 10:39:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.oltronics.net) (204.213.85.8) by mta1 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2000 10:38:59 -0000
Received: from neofelis (root@localhost) by mail.oltronics.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id GAA21245 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 06:38:49 -0400
X-BlackMail: 207.15.133.47, neofelis, <phma@oltronics.net>, 207.15.133.47
X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 06:38:51(EDT) on August 23, 2000
To: Lojban List <lojban@egroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] le stura be la gihuste
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 06:34:41 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2]
Content-Type: text/plain
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008230846590.3571-100000@burp.n>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008230846590.3571-100000@burp.n>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0008230638140H.02704@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

>> The current structure of the gismu list is designed for 
>> LogFlash. Translations need not abide by the structure, and perhaps should 
>> not try to do so. AFTER a translation is done, a LogFlash-compatible 
>> structure could be devised for French Lojbanists who might wish to use 
>> LogFlash with French to Lojban keywords.
>AFAIK (or, I hope ?) the gismu list was not done only for Logflash's
>purposes! 

I made a modification to the gimste in which every cross-reference is preceded
by an at sign. This is trivial to remove and makes it easier on my php script
(which I haven't yet got around to handling the "not found" error) to find
cross-references; without the marker, it misflags English words like "curve"
and "force" which happen to look like gismu.

phma

