From jjllambias@hotmail.com Wed Aug 23 18:55:30 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27201 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2000 01:55:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 24 Aug 2000 01:55:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.60) by mta2 with SMTP; 24 Aug 2000 01:55:28 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 18:55:28 -0700 Received: from 200.42.152.190 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.42.152.190] To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] xu Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 01:55:28 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Aug 2000 01:55:28.0503 (UTC) FILETIME=[609FE870:01C00D6E] From: "Jorge Llambias" > >i u'i doi maikl xu la'e di'u cmima lei do kusru selsku > >We use >{xu} initially a whole lot to make a sentence a question, but that's >because it attaches to the {.i} and thus to the sentence as a whole. Or am >I misreading the parse here? Yes, you're right. I just didn't want the {u'i} to be inside the question. I actually do that a lot, using an attitudinal before {xu}. I suppose I should have said: i u'i doi maikl i xu la'e di'u cmima lei do kusru selsku co'o mi'e xorxes ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com