From pycyn@aol.com Fri Aug 25 15:00:39 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14514 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2000 22:00:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 25 Aug 2000 22:00:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r08.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.8) by mta1 with SMTP; 25 Aug 2000 22:00:38 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.15.) id a.c4.8646186 (2619) for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 18:00:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 18:00:34 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] World-historical and religious figures in Lojban To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com In a message dated 00-08-25 13:11:33 EDT, iad writes: << (What was the story about {-,dz.}? Is that acceptable? If not, I'll suggest {kunfu'ydz.}.) >> I don't think it is, alas and I think there is nothing to prevent a thoroughly CV person from say /dIz/ for /dz/. that latter aside, I don't find (and thought aulun was game too) kunfudz all that bad, thoug kunfu,ydz might be safer.