From pycyn@aol.com Wed Aug 30 07:28:45 2000
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
Received: (qmail 15668 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2000 14:28:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 30 Aug 2000 14:28:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r03.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.3) by mta2 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2000 14:28:45 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.15.) id a.c3.8c0bae2 (4235) for <lojban@egroups.com>; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:28:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <c3.8c0bae2.26de740c@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:28:28 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: learning lojban
To: lojban@egroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41
From: pycyn@aol.com

In a message dated 00-08-30 06:31:46 EDT, garrett writes:

<< Is that
an affect of being a native speaker of english, where the consonant
sounds outnumber the vowels? >>
Consonant sounds always outnumber vowels (well, ...). The English problem is 
that we tend to reduce all unstressed vowels to schwa, a wishy-washy mid 
central vowel. In addition we tend to be pretty uninterested in the ends of 
words generally, since we add all the boring stuff there and put the content 
up front.

