From xod@sixgirls.org Sat Sep 02 11:56:59 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8952 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2000 18:56:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Sep 2000 18:56:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO erika.sixgirls.org) (207.12.88.107) by mta2 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2000 18:56:59 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by erika.sixgirls.org (8.11.0+3.3W/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e82Iuwa06888 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 14:56:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 14:56:57 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] samselpla vs. samjva In-Reply-To: <20000902075930.40A7126333@mail.taral.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Taral wrote: > Since lujvo aren't standardized, I'd like to suggest a change from > "samselpla" to "samjva". I tend to view "samselpla" (computer type-of > plan) as "computer architecture", whereas "samjva" (computer type-of > rule(s)) really echoes my idea of what a "computer program" is. > > Comments? Did you read my recent mention of the term "mucti minji" for computer program? ----- We have an unlimited faith in the ability of technology to alter nature. We need the same faith in the ability of culture to alter human nature.