From xod@sixgirls.org Sat Sep 02 12:05:33 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28110 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2000 19:05:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Sep 2000 19:05:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO erika.sixgirls.org) (207.12.88.107) by mta3 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2000 19:05:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by erika.sixgirls.org (8.11.0+3.3W/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e82J5Wk06917 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 15:05:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 15:05:32 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] samselpla vs. samjva In-Reply-To: <20000902190103.6615126333@mail.taral.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Taral wrote: > On 2 Sep, Invent Yourself wrote: > > > Did you read my recent mention of the term "mucti minji" for computer > > program? > > No, but I'm not sure I like it. It's a bit too general. What else do you suppose it could mean? And what else expresses the Object Oriented (or post-Object Oriented!) nature of software? skami pruce reflects the structure/procedural era too much for me. ----- We have an unlimited faith in the ability of technology to alter nature. We need the same faith in the ability of culture to alter human nature.