Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: learning lojban [2]

From: Ivan A Derzhanski <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 07:57:24 +0300

John Leuner wrote:
[replying to me]
> > Looks plain enough to me: Lojban {djon.} may be a usable
> > lojbanisation of English _Joan_ [dZoUn] is nothing better
> > can be found, but it is not valid to pronounce {djon.} as
> > [dZoUn], only as [dZon] or [dZOn].
> 
> If I understand this, you're saying that la djon. is what I want?

Yes, of course.

--Ivan