From iad@MATH.BAS.BG Mon Sep 04 23:02:19 2000
Return-Path: <iad@math.bas.bg>
Received: (qmail 18976 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2000 06:02:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 5 Sep 2000 06:02:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lnd.internet-bg.net) (212.124.64.2) by mta1 with SMTP; 5 Sep 2000 06:02:17 -0000
Received: from math.bas.bg (ppp27.internet-bg.net [212.124.66.27]) by lnd.internet-bg.net (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id JAA32033 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 09:17:55 +0300
Message-ID: <39B47D34.BE8B6112@math.bas.bg>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 07:57:24 +0300
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: learning lojban [2]
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10009032253490.10331-100000@svetlana.mweb.co.za>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ivan A Derzhanski <iad@MATH.BAS.BG>

John Leuner wrote:
[replying to me]
> > Looks plain enough to me: Lojban {djon.} may be a usable
> > lojbanisation of English _Joan_ [dZoUn] is nothing better
> > can be found, but it is not valid to pronounce {djon.} as
> > [dZoUn], only as [dZon] or [dZOn].
> 
> If I understand this, you're saying that la djon. is what I want?

Yes, of course.

--Ivan



