From phma@oltronics.net Wed Sep 06 05:47:21 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18646 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2000 12:47:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 6 Sep 2000 12:47:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (207.15.133.22) by mta2 with SMTP; 6 Sep 2000 12:47:18 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 805663C563; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 08:45:43 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] RE: emacs, etc. Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 08:44:14 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain References: <34.a12ea97.26e6ee6b@aol.com> <0009060126530G.28659@neofelis> In-Reply-To: <0009060126530G.28659@neofelis> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0009060845420K.28659@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat On Wed, 06 Sep 2000, Pierre Abbat wrote: >>either. I had similar experiences with Forth (an anti-establishment >>programming language, it says) and Pascal. I don't see the evil hand of MS > >mi ciska lo sampla be bau la'o gy. Forth .gy be'o poi se sazri ci'e la .uindoz >e la linuks. s/sampla/samselpla/ >http://virtual.oltronics.net/~phma/Software/csv2html.html > >co'omi'e pier.