From pycyn@aol.com Wed Sep 06 10:30:04 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17282 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2000 17:30:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 6 Sep 2000 17:30:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r02.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.2) by mta3 with SMTP; 6 Sep 2000 17:30:04 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.15.) id a.94.9283e5b (4546) for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:29:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <94.9283e5b.26e7d911@aol.com> Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:29:53 EDT Subject: RE: emacs, etc. To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com In a message dated 00-09-06 01:28:40 EDT, pier writes: << mi ciska lo sampla be bau la'o gy. Forth .gy be'o poi se sazri ci'e la .uindoz e la linuks. http://virtual.oltronics.net/~phma/Software/csv2html.html >> Since I hated Forth (but ya use what ya got), I am less than cheered by this news; I'd hate for it to be the exception to prove the rule or the future universal language. But, on the other hand, if someone else is writing it .... So can someone write a useful Lojban-directed program in Forth?