From mark@kli.org Wed Sep 13 19:50:52 2000
Return-Path: <mark@kli.org>
Received: (qmail 14011 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2000 02:50:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 14 Sep 2000 02:50:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO pi.meson.org) (209.191.39.185) by mta1 with SMTP; 14 Sep 2000 02:50:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 28519 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Sep 2000 02:45:32 -0000
Date: 14 Sep 2000 02:45:32 -0000
Message-ID: <20000914024532.28517.qmail@pi.meson.org>
To: lojban@egroups.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0009121727240.14430-100000@erika.sixgirls.org> (message from Invent Yourself on Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:29:45 -0400 (EDT))
Subject: Re: [lojban] rape
References: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0009121727240.14430-100000@erika.sixgirls.org>
From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <mark@kli.org>

>From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
>Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:29:45 -0400 (EDT)
>
>
>e'u lu xebni vlile gletu li'u 
>
>Consensual and rough = pendo vlile gletu

Mm. Not bad. Straightforward and to the point. Doesn't focus on the
non-consensuality, which is what I was thinking, but that may be more a
defect in my focus than yours. Still want something for the
non-consensuality though.

~mark