From mark@kli.org Wed Sep 13 19:59:53 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15463 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2000 02:59:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 14 Sep 2000 02:59:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pi.meson.org) (209.191.39.185) by mta3 with SMTP; 14 Sep 2000 02:59:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 28556 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Sep 2000 02:54:33 -0000 Date: 14 Sep 2000 02:54:33 -0000 Message-ID: <20000914025433.28555.qmail@pi.meson.org> To: lojban@egroups.com In-reply-to: <20000912065305.A202@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com> (message from Richard Curnow on Tue, 12 Sep 2000 06:53:05 +0100) Subject: Re: [lojban] pe'a & po'a fixed in jbofihe References: <20000912065305.A202@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com> From: "Mark E. Shoulson" >Mail-Followup-To: Lojban List >User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i-nntp >From: Richard Curnow >Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 06:53:05 +0100 > > >coi rodo poi pilno la jbofi'e > >I've implemented the small fix required to make pe'a and po'a parseable. >Since it's so small I'm waiting for something more beefy to fix before >doing another 'full' release. The current fix is available under 'patch >to development version' via the link http://go.to/jbofihe. Erm, my ma'orste disagrees, but I seem to recall that pe'a was thrown into UI, and fu'e/fu'o were used to make long scopes of figurativeness. Am I misremembering? ~mark