From taral@taral.net Fri Sep 22 13:50:27 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: taral@taral.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_0_2); 22 Sep 2000 20:50:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 9747 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2000 20:50:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 22 Sep 2000 20:50:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.taral.net) (128.83.112.187) by mta2 with SMTP; 22 Sep 2000 20:50:25 -0000 Received: by mail.taral.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id BEF6B26333; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 15:50:22 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 15:50:20 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: [lojban] Get Much Ca$h ! To: lojban@egroups.com In-Reply-To: <00092213350117.00920@neofelis> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; BOUNDARY="8323328-1804289383-969655822=:16886" Message-Id: <20000922205022.BEF6B26333@mail.taral.net> From: Taral --8323328-1804289383-969655822=:16886 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii On 22 Sep, Pierre Abbat wrote: >>According to the EBNF grammar xref, NOI is in relative_clause_122, which >>has terminator KUhO. > > I ran my post through jbofi'e and it parsed it without complaining about a > missing KUhO or anything else. It's not missing, but without the KUhO, the "e zoi gy. DNS Central gy." ends up in the NOI clause. -- Taral Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail. --8323328-1804289383-969655822=:16886 Content-Type: APPLICATION/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.1.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAjnLxg4ACgkQ7rh4CE+nYEn6SACfVTvf6BkosO9IQ1+Jwr+q3bMm vhwAn1VijTSLrWPBuALE4y/O+m1B7B+x =l+Oe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8323328-1804289383-969655822=:16886--