From taral@taral.net Sat Sep 23 16:47:49 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: taral@taral.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_0_2); 23 Sep 2000 23:47:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 19615 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2000 23:47:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 23 Sep 2000 23:47:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.taral.net) (128.83.176.159) by mta1 with SMTP; 23 Sep 2000 23:47:48 -0000 Received: by mail.taral.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5930226333; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 18:47:46 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 18:45:15 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: [lojban] Get Much Ca$h ! To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; BOUNDARY="8323328-846930886-969752866=:19571" Message-Id: <20000923234746.5930226333@mail.taral.net> From: Taral --8323328-846930886-969752866=:19571 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii On 23 Sep, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > 'lo glico selsku na nibli' is where it breaks. So, the question is, > does na provide an ending for nu? Any experts wanna throw down? It's supposed to be 'lo glico selsku cu na nibli' -- Taral Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail. --8323328-846930886-969752866=:19571 Content-Type: APPLICATION/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.1.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAjnNQSIACgkQ7rh4CE+nYEnRngCeIirfoZ8htItRiK3PTX1yWKlR NkoAn0xCnaUwIpXEwVcJLhUoWwSMMAHS =1L3k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8323328-846930886-969752866=:19571--