From phma@oltronics.net Sat Sep 23 19:56:20 2000
Return-Path: <phma@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_0_2); 24 Sep 2000 02:56:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 15367 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2000 02:56:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 24 Sep 2000 02:56:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (207.15.133.7) by mta2 with SMTP; 24 Sep 2000 02:56:18 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1488B3C574; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 22:36:11 -0400 (EDT)
To: Lojban list <lojban@egroups.com>
Subject: pe:ne::po:?
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 22:26:44 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2]
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0009232236111G.00920@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

We have "pe" and "ne", the first being restrictive, the second incidental.
Similarly "poi" and "noi". Now if I do the same thing to "po", I get "no", but
that means zero. So how do you express incidental possession?

phma

