Subject: Re: [lojban] pe:ne::po:?

From: Taral <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 00:45:33 -0500 (CDT)

On 23 Sep, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> 
> We have "pe" and "ne", the first being restrictive, the second incidental.
> Similarly "poi" and "noi". Now if I do the same thing to "po", I get "no", but
> that means zero. So how do you express incidental possession?

There's a bit in the Book on this... let me see... pages 174-5 deal with
it... I can't find it right now. Oh, well.

-- 
Taral <[email-masked]>
Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail.