From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Tue Sep 26 11:39:26 2000
Return-Path: <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_0_3); 26 Sep 2000 18:39:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 10477 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2000 18:39:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 26 Sep 2000 18:39:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta1 with SMTP; 26 Sep 2000 18:39:25 -0000
Received: from calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA25804 for <lojban@egroups.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:42:09 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200009261842.OAA25804@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Get Much Ca$h ! 
In-Reply-To: Message from "=?iso-8859-1?q?Alfred_W._Tueting_(T=FCting)?=" <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de> of "Tue, 26 Sep 2000 12:45:41 -0000." <8qq5pl+dit4@eGroups.com> 
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:42:09 -0400
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>


"=?iso-8859-1?q?Alfred_W._Tueting_(T=FCting)?=" writes:
>--- In lojban@egroups.com, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@c...> wrote:
>>
>> >> la aulun cusku di'e
>
>> >.i mi na pu djuno lenu do pensi le dadjo terctu noi ca cusku le nu
>lo
>> >roda lo roda cu selnirna gi'e rorci
>> 
>> <chuckle> Why use _sel_nirna when nirna only has two arguments and
>you
>> were giving them both the same value? 
>
>My Lojban still being pretty awkward, I'd appreciate others more
>knowledgable than my poorself to contribute to your interesting 
>remark.
>What I wanted to express is to be found on my site
>http://members.tripod.de/Aolungfei/PREFACE.HTML (keyword "Alan Watts"
>will lead to about this portion of text).

Oh, don't get me wrong, you expressed that just fine, you just used an
unecessary syllable. I'm going to lunch now, so someone else will have
to explain.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
Despite not getting very emotional about it, the fact that quantum
entanglement doesn't allow transmission of information is probably the
most profound dissapointment I've ever experienced. -- RLPowell

