From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sun Oct 01 13:15:32 2000
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_0_3); 1 Oct 2000 20:15:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 28187 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2000 20:15:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 1 Oct 2000 20:15:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.125) by mta1 with SMTP; 1 Oct 2000 20:15:32 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:15:31 -0700
Received: from 200.42.152.218 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:15:30 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [200.42.152.218]
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] More questions on space (time) - was: Get Much Ca$h !
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:15:30 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F125LB1ygHZl5FdfDtM0000a730@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Oct 2000 20:15:31.0885 (UTC) FILETIME=[59673DD0:01C02BE4]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>

la aulun cusku di'e

>.i pamoi za'o ku mi pu fanva zoi ky. Wo nichts ist, hat der Kaiser
>sein Recht verloren ky. fi le dotco bangu la lojban. lu le selzvati
>be
>noda cu jai vi cirko le catni fai lo'e nolrainoltru li'u i. pe'u roko
>ji'isku ma
>(For unknown reason the text wouldn't parse! What's wrong?)

{pamoi} is a selbri, and so is {pu fanva}. You can't have
two separate selbri for the same bridi. You can use
{pamai} instead of {pamoi} there.


>One more question on {jai}:
>
>1) le mlatu ca pavbu loi ratcu vi le foldi
>2) le foldi cu jai vi ca pavbu loi ratcu fai le mlatu
>3) le jai vi be ca pavbu loi ratcu (fai le mlatu) cu foldi

That one should be:

le jai vi ca kavbu be loi ratcu (bei fai le mlatu) cu foldi

>4) le jai vi be *le mlatu* ca pavbu loi ratcu cu foldi (???)
>
>Is 4) correct?

I don't think so. {jai vi} works more or less like {se},
it can't be followed by {be} or by a sumti.

>I doubt whether it's 2nd place can contain {le mlatu}
>in this order. Why then at all use the place conversion tag
>{jai}?

{jai vi kavbu} is a selbri with the same places of
{kavbu}, except that the first place is replaced by a
location and the usual x1 place is now in the fai-place.

>Still another question:
>
>1) mi pu penmi do soi vo'a zi le critu (noi jai zu vu selpanci fai
>loi rozgu)
>2) mi'o pu penmi ... (each other?)

mi'o pu simxu le ka penmi

co'o mi'e xorxes



_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.


