From pycyn@aol.com Sun Oct 01 16:00:33 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_0_3); 1 Oct 2000 23:00:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 5683 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2000 23:00:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 1 Oct 2000 23:00:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d04.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 1 Oct 2000 23:00:32 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.24.) id a.e3.a7088b0 (3953) for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:00:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:00:26 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: {za'o} in space To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com As I said, aulun's point is a good one and, if we want to be precise -- as we do in textbooks and reference grammars, we would do things in the way suggested. But, with motion, we have the option to use space to mark time and so we often do. We do not disagree about the rule, justy about how strictly it is to be applied in some cases. (The motion may, it turns out, be implicit -- "He kept on building after 59th street -- i.e., on 60th and even 61st -- moving his hideous string of building ever uptownward.)