From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Mon Oct 02 14:43:47 2000
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_0_3); 2 Oct 2000 21:43:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 9069 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2000 21:41:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Oct 2000 21:41:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mq.egroups.com) (10.1.1.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2000 21:41:44 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
Received: from [10.1.2.211] by mq.egroups.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2000 21:41:44 -0000
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 21:41:18 -0000
To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: More questions on space (time) - was: Get Much Ca$h !
Message-ID: <8ravdu+l4c1@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <F125LB1ygHZl5FdfDtM0000a730@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 1595
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79
From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Alfred_W._Tueting_(T=FCting)?=" <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>

--- In lojban@egroups.com, "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@h...> wrote:
> la aulun cusku di'e
> 
> >.i pamoi za'o ku mi pu fanva zoi ky. Wo nichts ist, hat der Kaiser
> >sein Recht verloren ky. fi le dotco bangu la lojban. lu le selzvati
> >be
> >noda cu jai vi cirko le catni fai lo'e nolrainoltru li'u i. pe'u
roko
> >ji'isku ma
> >(For unknown reason the text wouldn't parse! What's wrong?)
> 
> {pamoi} is a selbri, and so is {pu fanva}. You can't have
> two separate selbri for the same bridi. You can use
> {pamai} instead of {pamoi} there.

Oh, {pamoi} was a typo, I really thought of {paroi} which is not a
selbri.
.i ku'i ji'a lu paroi za'o li'u na'e drani xe fanva zoi gy. once more
gy. la lojban. zo'e mi .i .ui mi se zdile .i mi pu srera le nu fanva 
kei le nu cusku zoi ny. noch einmal ny bau dotco .i semu'i mi stidi
lu ji'a paroi li'u .i do stidi ma

> >One more question on {jai}:
> >
> >1) le mlatu ca pavbu loi ratcu vi le foldi
> >2) le foldi cu jai vi ca pavbu loi ratcu fai le mlatu
> >3) le jai vi be ca pavbu loi ratcu (fai le mlatu) cu foldi
> 
> That one should be:
> 
> le jai vi ca kavbu be loi ratcu (bei fai le mlatu) cu foldi

> {jai vi} works more or less like {se},
> it can't be followed by {be} or by a sumti.

je'e o'anai

> >Still another question:
> >
> >1) mi pu penmi do soi vo'a zi le critu (noi jai zu vu selpanci fai
> >loi rozgu)
> >2) mi'o pu penmi ... (each other?)
> 
> mi'o pu simxu le ka penmi

ki'e tcexau 

.i mi za'o ji'a ve preti di'e .i lu le jai zi li'u ji le jai ca li'u
cu drani fo la lojban. .i .a'o zo .e ba danfu

co'o mi'e .aulun.