From taral@taral.net Fri Oct 06 18:56:24 2000
Return-Path: <taral@taral.net>
X-Sender: taral@taral.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_0_3); 7 Oct 2000 01:56:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 1277 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2000 01:56:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 7 Oct 2000 01:56:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.taral.net) (128.83.176.70) by mta2 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2000 01:56:23 -0000
Received: by mail.taral.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1B59826333; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 20:56:20 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 20:56:17 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: [lojban] logflash
To: Lojban list <lojban@egroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <200010070010.UAA22566@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; BOUNDARY="8323328-1804289383-970883780=:5654"
Message-Id: <20001007015620.1B59826333@mail.taral.net>
From: Taral <taral@taral.net>

--8323328-1804289383-970883780=:5654
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii

On 6 Oct, Robin Lee Powell wrote:

> le mu'e caca'o mi cilre la lojban. cu cabna le nu mi nitcu cilre le smuni
> valsi [1] .ije mi pilno la linuks. .ije mi zgana le nu casnu le zu'o
> finti le cnino be la logflac. .i mi cpedu le nu ko tavla mi le ka do
> jinvi ma le si'o le xamgu cu me la linuks logflac.

stidi lu le cnino me la logflac. lu'e

I'm not sure you want that "ma" there... It turns your imperative into a
question.

-- 
Taral <taral@taral.net>
Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail.
"Never ascribe to malice what can as easily be put down to stupidity."

--8323328-1804289383-970883780=:5654
Content-Type: APPLICATION/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEABECAAYFAjnegsQACgkQ7rh4CE+nYElG3ACgrIqamGxfX79I8Tr9QBCgC24t
REgAn1SHeJWm88FMDcd90+CjUwDgjQrB
=pIew
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--8323328-1804289383-970883780=:5654--

