From phma@oltronics.net Tue Oct 10 17:13:19 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@oltronics.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 11 Oct 2000 00:13:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 6767 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2000 00:13:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m1.onelist.org with QMQP; 11 Oct 2000 00:13:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.oltronics.net) (204.213.85.8) by mta1 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2000 00:13:18 -0000 Received: from neofelis (root@localhost) by mail.oltronics.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA25855 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:13:08 -0400 X-BlackMail: 207.15.133.12, neofelis, , 207.15.133.12 X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 20:13:15(EDT) on October 10, 2000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] krefu etc. Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:11:20 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00101020124401.08496@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Pierre Abbat On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Jorge Llambias wrote: >There is a recurrence, namely of (part of) the name of the day, >the date. I think {detke'u} (detri krefu) is better than >anything involving {djedi}. The place structure would be: > >detke'u: k1 (k2=d1) k3 d2 [d3] d4 > x1 is the x2'nd anniversary (date recurrence) of > event x3 [at location x4] by calendar x5. > >(The location is one of those tertirxu places that shouldn't >be a part of detri in the first place.) Then drop it from detke'u. I was born in one place, but I didn't have all my birthdays in the same place. phma