From pycyn@aol.com Tue Oct 10 17:42:39 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 11 Oct 2000 00:42:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 19787 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2000 00:42:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 11 Oct 2000 00:42:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d07.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.39) by mta3 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2000 00:42:38 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.26.) id a.68.80d33c0 (3930) for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:42:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <68.80d33c0.27151174@aol.com> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:42:28 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] krefu etc. To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com In a message dated 00-10-10 19:57:47 EDT, xorxes writes: << The location is one of those tertirxu places that shouldn't be a part of detri in the first place.) >> Yes it should, unless we start dating days Julian days (or star dates). As we just learned from the Olympics, thing that happen on one day in one place, happen on another in another. We could, I suppose introduce a convention on this, but I'm not sure it would work: would we all celebrate New Years' together? When? The interinterpretability of space and time again.