From pycyn@aol.com Tue Oct 10 17:51:19 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_1_0); 11 Oct 2000 00:51:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 10571 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2000 00:51:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 11 Oct 2000 00:51:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d04.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 11 Oct 2000 00:51:18 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.26.) id a.68.80bb374 (662) for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:50:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <68.80bb374.27151373@aol.com> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:50:59 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] krefu etc. To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 41 From: pycyn@aol.com In a message dated 00-10-10 20:39:10 EDT, xorxes writes: << Even in {detke'u} it would remain the location of the original event x3, so that would not be a problem. >> One possible rule, I suppose, but not a good one for anniversaries. In the US we celebrate George Washington's Birthday (if at all) something like 13 days off of the date he was born on where he was born (the OS -NS shift having come there after his birth.). But we get the right day.